vLLM Architecture Explained: PagedAttention, Continuous Batching, and 4.5x Growth

In the rapidly evolving landscape of large language model (LLM) serving, vLLM has emerged as a game-changing open-source inference engine that delivers unprecedented performance improvements. While traditional serving systems struggle with memory fragmentation and inefficient resource utilization, vLLM achieves 4.5x higher throughput through its innovative PagedAttention mechanism and continuous batching architecture. This technical deep dive explores the architectural innovations that make vLLM the go-to solution for production LLM serving.

The Memory Bottleneck Problem in LLM Inference

Before understanding vLLM’s solutions, we must first grasp the fundamental challenges in LLM serving. The primary bottleneck isn’t computational power—it’s memory management, specifically the Key-Value (KV) cache.

KV Cache: The Memory Monster

When processing sequences through transformer models, the attention mechanism generates and stores key-value pairs for each token position. This KV cache grows linearly with sequence length and batch size, creating massive memory demands:

# Simplified KV cache memory calculation
kv_cache_size = batch_size * sequence_length * num_layers * num_heads * head_dim * 2 * bytes_per_param

# Example: LLaMA-70B with 4096 sequence length, batch size 32
# kv_cache_size ≈ 32 * 4096 * 80 * 64 * 128 * 2 * 2 = ~67 GB

Traditional serving systems face three critical issues:

1. Memory Fragmentation: Fixed-size allocation for variable-length sequences wastes 60-80% of memory
2. Inefficient Batching: Static batching leaves GPU resources idle during generation
3. Poor Preemption: Cannot efficiently pause/resume requests

PagedAttention: Virtual Memory for LLMs

vLLM’s breakthrough innovation, PagedAttention, applies virtual memory concepts from operating systems to LLM serving. Just as operating systems manage physical memory through pages, vLLM manages KV cache through logical blocks.

How PagedAttention Works

PagedAttention divides the KV cache into fixed-size blocks (typically 16 tokens), treating them as memory pages:

class PagedAttentionBlock:
    def __init__(self, block_size=16):
        self.block_size = block_size
        self.keys = torch.zeros(block_size, hidden_dim)
        self.values = torch.zeros(block_size, hidden_dim)
        self.occupied = 0
        
    def append_tokens(self, new_keys, new_values):
        # Append tokens to block, return overflow
        remaining_space = self.block_size - self.occupied
        to_copy = min(remaining_space, len(new_keys))
        
        self.keys[self.occupied:self.occupied+to_copy] = new_keys[:to_copy]
        self.values[self.occupied:self.occupied+to_copy] = new_values[:to_copy]
        self.occupied += to_copy
        
        return new_keys[to_copy:], new_values[to_copy:]

Block Table: The Page Table Equivalent

Each request maintains a block table mapping logical blocks to physical GPU memory:

class RequestBlockTable:
    def __init__(self):
        self.logical_blocks = []  # Logical block IDs
        self.physical_blocks = [] # Physical block pointers
        self.block_size = 16
        
    def allocate_block(self):
        # Get free physical block from memory pool
        physical_block = memory_pool.get_free_block()
        logical_block_id = len(self.logical_blocks)
        
        self.logical_blocks.append(logical_block_id)
        self.physical_blocks.append(physical_block)
        
        return logical_block_id

This architecture enables three critical benefits:

1. Eliminates External Fragmentation: Blocks are fixed-size, preventing wasted space between sequences
2. Enables Efficient Sharing: Multiple requests can share blocks (useful for parallel sampling)
3. Supports Preemption: Requests can be paused and resumed by preserving block tables

Continuous Batching: Dynamic Request Management

Traditional static batching processes fixed batches of requests simultaneously, leading to GPU underutilization as faster requests wait for slower ones. vLLM implements continuous batching (also called iteration-level batching) to maximize GPU utilization.

Iteration-Level Scheduling

In continuous batching, the scheduler processes one token generation step across all active requests:

class ContinuousBatchScheduler:
    def __init__(self):
        self.active_requests = []
        self.max_batch_size = 256
        
    def schedule_iteration(self):
        # Group requests by their current generation step
        requests_by_step = self._group_requests_by_step()
        
        for step_requests in requests_by_step:
            if len(step_requests) > 0:
                # Execute single generation step for all requests at this step
                self._execute_generation_step(step_requests)
                
    def _execute_generation_step(self, requests):
        # Prepare batched input tensors
        input_ids = self._gather_inputs(requests)
        
        # Execute model forward pass
        with torch.cuda.amp.autocast():
            outputs = model(input_ids)
            
        # Scatter outputs back to individual requests
        self._scatter_outputs(requests, outputs)
        
        # Update request states
        for request in requests:
            if request.is_completed():
                self._remove_request(request)

Real-World Performance Impact

Continuous batching demonstrates dramatic improvements in real deployments:

Metric	Static Batching	Continuous Batching	Improvement
GPU Utilization	35-45%	85-95%	2.4x
Requests/sec	12.5	56.3	4.5x
P95 Latency	4.2s	1.8s	57% reduction
Memory Efficiency	42%	89%	2.1x

Memory Pool Management: The Engine Behind Efficiency

vLLM’s memory management system operates like a high-performance memory allocator, optimized for the unique patterns of LLM inference.

Block Allocation Strategy

The memory pool maintains free lists of blocks at different sizes, enabling O(1) allocation:

class MemoryPool:
    def __init__(self, total_memory, block_sizes=[16, 32, 64]):
        self.total_memory = total_memory
        self.block_sizes = block_sizes
        self.free_lists = {size: [] for size in block_sizes}
        self.allocated_blocks = set()
        
    def allocate_blocks(self, num_blocks, block_size):
        # Try to allocate from free list first
        if len(self.free_lists[block_size]) >= num_blocks:
            return [self.free_lists[block_size].pop() for _ in range(num_blocks)]
            
        # Otherwise allocate new blocks
        return self._allocate_new_blocks(num_blocks, block_size)
        
    def free_blocks(self, blocks):
        for block in blocks:
            self.free_lists[block.size].append(block)
            self.allocated_blocks.remove(block)

Garbage Collection and Defragmentation

vLLM implements sophisticated garbage collection that:

• Identifies and reclaims orphaned blocks
• Compacts memory when fragmentation exceeds thresholds
• Prioritizes block reuse to minimize allocation overhead

Advanced Optimizations and Features

Prefix Caching for Repeated Prompts

vLLM intelligently caches computed KV cache for common prompt prefixes, dramatically reducing computation for repeated patterns:

class PrefixCache:
    def __init__(self):
        self.cache = {}
        self.hits = 0
        self.misses = 0
        
    def get_cached_prefix(self, prompt_tokens):
        # Generate cache key from prompt prefix
        cache_key = self._generate_cache_key(prompt_tokens)
        
        if cache_key in self.cache:
            self.hits += 1
            return self.cache[cache_key]
        else:
            self.misses += 1
            return None

Multi-LoRA Support

vLLM efficiently supports multiple LoRA adapters through shared base model weights and dynamic adapter switching:

class MultiLoRAManager:
    def __init__(self, base_model):
        self.base_model = base_model
        self.active_adapters = {}
        
    def switch_adapter(self, request, adapter_id):
        # Apply LoRA weights for specific request
        if adapter_id not in self.active_adapters:
            self._load_adapter(adapter_id)
            
        request.adapter_weights = self.active_adapters[adapter_id]

Real-World Deployment Architecture

Production vLLM Cluster

A typical production vLLM deployment consists of:

# docker-compose.yml for vLLM cluster
services:
  vllm-worker:
    image: vllm/vllm-openai:latest
    deploy:
      replicas: 4
    environment:
      - MODEL=meta-llama/Llama-3-70B-Instruct
      - GPU_MEMORY_UTILIZATION=0.9
      - MAX_MODEL_LEN=16384
    
  load-balancer:
    image: nginx:latest
    ports:
      - "8000:8000"
    configs:
      - source: nginx.conf
        target: /etc/nginx/nginx.conf

Performance Monitoring

Comprehensive monitoring is essential for production deployments:

class vLLMMonitor:
    def collect_metrics(self):
        return {
            'throughput': self.requests_processed / self.time_window,
            'memory_efficiency': self.used_blocks / self.total_blocks,
            'p95_latency': self.calculate_percentile(95),
            'batch_utilization': self.active_requests / self.max_batch_size,
            'cache_hit_rate': self.prefix_cache.hits / 
                            (self.prefix_cache.hits + self.prefix_cache.misses)
        }

Performance Benchmarks and Analysis

Comparative Analysis

Independent benchmarks demonstrate vLLM’s superiority across multiple dimensions:

Throughput Comparison (Tokens/sec, LLaMA-70B, A100-80GB)

• Hugging Face Transformers: 45 tokens/sec
• TensorRT-LLM: 128 tokens/sec
• vLLM: 210 tokens/sec

Memory Efficiency (GB per concurrent request)

• Traditional Serving: 3.2 GB/request
• Optimized Serving: 1.8 GB/request
• vLLM: 0.7 GB/request

Scalability Analysis

vLLM demonstrates near-linear scaling with additional GPUs:

# Scaling efficiency analysis
gpus = [1, 2, 4, 8]
throughput = [210, 405, 790, 1520]  # tokens/sec
scaling_efficiency = [1.0, 0.96, 0.94, 0.90]  # vs ideal linear

Implementation Best Practices

Configuration Optimization

Optimal vLLM configuration depends on workload characteristics:

# Chat application configuration
chat_config = {
    'block_size': 16,           # Smaller blocks for variable-length conversations
    'gpu_memory_utilization': 0.85,
    'max_num_batched_tokens': 2048,
    'max_num_seqs': 256
}

# Document processing configuration  
doc_config = {
    'block_size': 64,           # Larger blocks for long documents
    'gpu_memory_utilization': 0.9,
    'max_num_batched_tokens': 8192,
    'max_num_seqs': 128
}

Monitoring and Alerting

Critical metrics to monitor in production:

• Block allocation failure rate
• Memory fragmentation percentage
• Request queue depth
• PagedAttention cache hit rate
• Continuous batching efficiency

Future Directions and vLLM Evolution

Ongoing Development

The vLLM team continues to push boundaries with:

• Speculative Decoding: Draft-then-verify approach for 2-3x speedup
• Quantization Support: 4-bit and 8-bit quantization for memory reduction
• Distributed Inference: Multi-node, multi-GPU scaling
• Hardware Optimization: Custom kernels for emerging AI accelerators

Industry Impact

vLLM’s architecture has influenced the entire LLM serving ecosystem:

• TensorRT-LLM adopted similar memory management concepts
• Major cloud providers integrated vLLM into their managed services
• Open-source projects built specialized optimizations on vLLM foundation

Conclusion: The vLLM Revolution

vLLM represents a paradigm shift in LLM serving architecture. By applying operating system principles to AI inference, it solves fundamental memory management challenges that plagued previous systems. The combination of PagedAttention, continuous batching, and sophisticated memory pooling delivers consistent 4.5x performance improvements while maintaining production-grade reliability.

For engineering teams deploying LLMs at scale, vLLM provides:

• Cost Reduction: Higher throughput per GPU dollar
• Improved Latency: Faster response times for end users
• Better Resource Utilization: Maximize infrastructure investment
• Production Reliability: Battle-tested in high-scale deployments

As LLMs continue to grow in size and complexity, vLLM’s architectural innovations ensure that serving infrastructure can keep pace with model capabilities, making advanced AI accessible and cost-effective for organizations of all sizes.

---

The Quantum Encoding Team specializes in high-performance AI infrastructure and optimization. Connect with us for architecture reviews and performance tuning of your LLM deployment.